Justice Delayed is Justice Denied Essay: A person visiting court usually seeks justice from law. But our judicial system takes longer than expected to deliver justice to the victim. The victims’ facts and evidence do not suffice to deliver justice. Ultimately the victim loses hope of achieving justice and feels depressed psychologically. He starts suffering mentally that he has lost the race and denied justice after years of battling and struggle.
Essay on Justice Delayed is Justice Denied
We have provided Justice Delayed is Justice Denied Essay in English, suitable for class 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10.
“Without Justice, life would not be possible, and even if it were, it would not be worth living”.
“Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” is a legal principle. Delay and unresolved questions have been the cause of controversy for the Indian judiciary for a long time. In the last five decades, the judiciary, leading experts, and legal advisors have established many schemes to address posting and adjudication problems in India.
Judge B.P.Singh gave a set of figures showing a moderate degree of dismissal and suspension of cases that exposes the real state of justice in India. A total of 50 lakh crimes are reported a year that the police try to solve. There is 1.32 Crore pending cases for lower courts, with 12,177 judges being of significant power. In criminal cases, 1,44 crores are still pending for the proceedings.
Causes of Delay
- An inadequate representation of judges in the Indian judiciary is the most visible reason behind cases’ pendency. The number of judges is not as much as required. In case we do not have an adequate number of judges to pick the case, the underlying motive which is equity will not be satisfied.
- The second significant reason behind the pendency of cases in the Indian court is recording fake cases with a mistaken intention to disqualify others. Moreover, there is a deferment of equity because of this. Delhi Women’s Commission (DCW) has found remarkable figures falsified for every 53.2 pence of attack cases reported in Delhi.
- Nowadays, the smallest office in the private sector has computers and other technical devices to increase their productivity and maintain their data. However, the technical assistance of faxes and other similar instruments has not been given to our judiciary. Every court has heaps of files of pending cases.
- The Code provides some provisions for dispute resolution and speedy trials, e.g. Joinder of charges, plea bargaining, summary hearings, etc. The question, however, is that the law is not fully enforced.
- Order X CPC performs a summary of trial sessions. In its 77th report, the Law Commission of India says that “with a specific goal of using the arrangements of Order X effectively, it is important that the trial judge read the pleadings of the meetings in advance and knows the instance of each assembly at the same point that it can properly place the inquiry and edge questions.”
Remedies to Overcome Delay
The country’s population and the number of lawsuits have increased, but adjudicatory systems continue to be understaffed. The same is right in the judiciary where there are fewer judges than the need. The number of judges per million in the world figures to be just two, one of the world’s lowest proportions.
The number of judges, particularly on the local level, must be increased urgently to enable ordinary citizens access. A body of judges, lawyers and legal scholars, who would be responsible for administering retraining exams to the Indian Judicial Service (IJS), must be formed at the national level. Following the National Judicial Service Commission’s advice, Article 233 should be amended to give the President the right to select members of the Indian Judicial Services.
As “justice delayed is justice denied”, they claim that “justice hurried is justice buried” is equally valid. Therefore, the requisite condition of fair justice and balance of convenience is an appropriate, rational and due hearing for all cases. Law is an outstanding achievement, which needs tremendous respect.